[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
Other Articles
October 14, 1950


JAMA. 1950;144(7):590. doi:10.1001/jama.1950.02920070080030

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.


In the public mind, exhibition of the male genitals by a grown man is a piece of unforgivably offensive naughtiness. Although it startles and embarrasses the observer, it hurts no one but the performer, who seems to have made an unconceivably bad bargain—for a childish, impersonal gratification he risks arrest, disgrace, legal punishment, social ostracism. A "crazier" piece of behavior can scarcely be imagined. Yet the public—and the police—treat it as if it were as tempting and reprehensible a piece of sinfulness as stealing a watch or exceeding the speed limit. Moreover, it is regarded as a special depravity, a kind of badness even worse than it seems, like torturing criminals or putting molasses in mailboxes.

Dr. Rickles, like most psychiatrists, is impressed with the inconsistency of such social attitudes with the scientific facts. He realizes that one tuberculous man spitting on the sidewalk or one cold-ridden stenographer sneezing in

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview