[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
March 26, 1955


Author Affiliations

684 Park Ave. Manhasset, L. I., N. Y.

JAMA. 1955;157(13):1152-1153. doi:10.1001/jama.1955.02950300080020

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.


To the Editor:—  In The Journal for Jan. 1, 1955, page 77, a letter appeared criticizing my article "Pathognomonic Abdominal Sign for Meckel's Diverticulitis," in The Journal, March 27, 1954, page 1083. I appreciate the writer's interest but must take exception to some of his remarks. These are that (1) rectal hemorrhage is not a cardinal sign of Meckel's diverticulitis but of a peptic ulcer in a Meckel's diverticulum, (2) the "alleged pathognomonic sign" is possible in other abdominal diseases and not only when a Meckel's diverticulum is connected with the umbilicus, and (3) this sign cannot be expected to contribute to a lowered mortality rate from Meckel's diverticulitis—as "waiting for it to appear would prove disastrous." To answer each of these criticisms: 1. It would seem apparent that whenever a Meckel's diverticulum is in any way involved in disease that inflammation (mechanical, bacterial, mycotic, viral, etc.) must be part

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview