[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
July 19, 1952


Author Affiliations

31091/2 N. Lincoln Ave. Chicago

JAMA. 1952;149(12):1156. doi:10.1001/jama.1952.02930290078025

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.


To the Editor:—  The editorial entitled "The Future of Otolaryngology," which appeared in the April 26 issue of The Journal, page 1508, was a true summary of the information now available in connection with otolaryngological practice today. However, more should have been said about meeting the challenge in spite of gloomy forecasts by some and bright predictions by others. It should be emphasized strongly that there always was, to a certain extent, the medical otolaryngologist whose chief interest lay in local rhinological and otological diseases (now allergic, psychosomatic, and dermatological) and the surgical otolaryngologist who quickly took up plastic surgery, bronchoesophagology, laryngoscopy, and even gastroscopy. Some mastered fenestrations, laryngeal surgery, neck dissection, esophageal surgery, and thyroid and cancer surgery; some also mastered ophthalmology and diseases of the chest.Some of those who still practice the conventional field of otolaryngology, especially in smaller communities, call the surgeons "super-specialists," overlooking the greater

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview