[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 50.16.52.237. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
December 15, 1956

WHIPLASH INJURY

Author Affiliations

525 S. Flower St. Los Angeles 17.

JAMA. 1956;162(16):1492. doi:10.1001/jama.1956.02970330064027

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

To the Editor:—  The article by Gotten, "Survey of One Hundred Cases of Whiplash Injury After Settlement of Litigation" (J. A. M. A.162:865 [Oct. 27] 1956) is the best approach to the problem that I have yet read. However, it is based only upon cases that were the subject of litigation and the conclusions are of necessity post hoc, ergo propter hoc. The figures can have no valid meaning until someone makes the same study, using the same questionnaire on the same number of cases of whiplash injury that have not been the subject of litigation. I strongly suspect that in such a control study the percentage recovery, length of disability, symptoms, and permanent disability will not be much different in the two series. Gotten's description of the mechanism of whiplash injury follows the common error, stating that when the victim's car is struck "from behind or from

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×