This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
To the Editor:
—In The Journal, April 26, 1952, page 1508, appeared an editorial on the future of otolaryngology, which emphasized that otolaryngology is a "shrinking surgical specialty"; that there is no such thing as the "uncontested domain of otolaryngology." I have practiced medicine for 40 years, during 25 of which the measures I used were strictly orthodox, just as I was taught. During that quarter of a century I viewed each patient as a candidate for surgery of some sort and my thinking stopped just there. Many well-meaning, sincere otolaryngologists today stop thinking just there. This is crucial to our specialty and must be radically changed if we are to advance or even survive.Fifteen years ago I kept for months a daily tabulation of my patients, under four headings: (1) those I really helped, (2) those for whom I did little to relieve their troubles, (3) those for
Roberts SE. THE FUTURE OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY. JAMA. 1952;150(15):1510-1511. doi:10.1001/jama.1952.03680150064026