[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.211.11.50. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
July 14, 1962

The Great Fallout Controversy-Reply

Author Affiliations

427 Bahamas Dr., Tucson, Ariz.

JAMA. 1962;181(2):172. doi:10.1001/jama.1962.03050280101018

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

To the Editor:—  The editorial, "The Great Fallout Controversy," has provoked comments. These have been complimentary comments by a ratio of 4 to 1. Just before the First World War, Max Steinitzer (a music critic) wrote: "We live in times which are both infinitely primitive and infinitely complex. The realities of life in our day cannot provide us with a firm guiding hand..." The more I read history, the more I am convinced that nobody has ever lived in "normal" times. The purpose of a critic (or an editorialist in medicine, politics, or music) is to make a distinction between the "guiding hand" and the "unguiding foot." Physical facts are not a guiding hand. They can be misused to misguide. The fact that strontium-90 has a half-life of 28 years and is found in cow's milk is incidental and uncommunicative. Strontium-90 does not have a biological half-time of 28 years:

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×