[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
June 11, 1960


Author Affiliations

1211 W. Washington Phoenix, Ariz.

JAMA. 1960;173(6):712. doi:10.1001/jama.1960.03020240100029

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.


To the Editor:—  The article by Ruesch and others in The Journal, April 2, page 1476, entitled "Continuing Hazard of Air Embolism During Pressure Transfusions," is an excellent discussion of this problem and ably presents an evaluation of the acceptable alternatives to the hazardous use of the air pump method. Unfortunately, in the comments concluding the article, the authors give an erroneous impression of the superiority of plastic bags. "Walters and co-workers [Surg. Gynec. & Obst., Sept., 1957, p. 365] and Strumia and colleagues [J. Lab. & Clin. Med., Aug., 1955, p. 225] stated that blood preserved in plastic bags shows less loss of platelets and longer red blood cell life than blood drawn in siliconized tubing and stored in siliconized bottles." Reference to the articles which are quoted in support of this statement reveals at once that both groups were comparing cell survival of blood collected in plastic bags

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview