This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
To the Editor:—
I did not understand the use of the term "Commons" in your editorial that referred to Vaughan's book in The Journal, June 11, page 682.
J. A. T.. BRITISH COMMONS. JAMA. 1960;173(9):1044. doi:10.1001/jama.1960.03020270070022