[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
Other Articles
October 21, 1961

Laënnec vs. Laennec

Author Affiliations

535 N. Dearborn St., Chicago 10

JAMA. 1961;178(3):354. doi:10.1001/jama.1961.03040420093031

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.


To the Editor:—  Apropos the letter of Viets regarding Laënnec or Laennec without diaeresis: I always used Laënnec with diaeresis. My authority for it is Larousse Illustré.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview