Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
July 10, 1967

Rational Responses to Graduate Education of Physicians

Author Affiliations

From the Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, Mass.

JAMA. 1967;201(2):112-114. doi:10.1001/jama.1967.03130020058013

My role in this program is clearly limited to a discussion of the report of the Millis Commission on Graduate Education (except that section on family practice) and specifically to present what might be a reasonable response to a study and its recommendations, which if followed, would alter greatly our present concept of education beyond medical school and would require drastic changes in its overall structure.

I begin with the assumption that those responsibile for education at this level recognize a need for and welcome a study in depth of graduate education, hopeful that from a better understanding of its weaknesses as well as its strength will come more coordinated and efficient educational opportunities for all of the recent medical school graduates.

Before proceeding to the report itself, I would like to comment briefly on the commission which developed it. There are undoubtedly many who believe that those selected to