[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.197.65.227. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
November 6, 1967

Sanity or Insanity and The Criminal Act

Author Affiliations

Los Angeles

JAMA. 1967;202(6):551. doi:10.1001/jama.1967.03130190157037

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

To the Editor:—  Dr. Scrignar's article (201:343, 1967) accurately highlights the existing confusion between competency determinations and the issue of insanity at the time of commission of a crime.Pretrial competency hearings certainly should not admit into evidence data concerning insanity at time of the commission of the crime. However, this does not preclude the physician from evaluating and expressing an opinion in his report concerning both issues, since frequently the court has requested an opinion regarding both issues. Furthermore, if the physician's reasoning in arriving at his conclusions is spelled out, the court is better able to evaluate whether the physician had had a clear understanding of the distinction between "present competency" and "insanity" at the time of commission of the alleged crime. A single examination regarding both of the above issues precludes unnecessary duplication of examinations.

×