This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
To the Editor.—
I was more amused than enlightened by Rosinski's editorial. I read his remarks with special interest since I had at least an "implied reputation as an educator" when I was appointed dean of the embryonic School of Medicine at University of California at San Diego in 1963.Unfortunately, I cannot accept either of his major premises. That is, neither do I believe that new medical schools have failed to innovate regarding curriculum, nor do I believe that "Rosinski's Law" adequately explains whatever failures may have occurred. Although I can speak much better for UCSD than for others, "we can point with pride" to a curriculum which has pared the required courses to approximately one half of the total curriculum time, gives the students the opportunity to choose a major concentration area with diverse selective-elective options, requires that all core courses are both interdepartmental and interdisciplinary, places the
Stokes J. Medical School Deans. JAMA. 1971;216(11):1863. doi:10.1001/jama.1971.03180370137033