[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.166.74.94. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
October 21, 1968

Interpretation of Serologic Tests for Typhoid Fever

Author Affiliations

From the Bureau of Disease Prevention and Environmental Control, National Communicable Disease Center, Atlanta.

JAMA. 1968;206(4):839-840. doi:10.1001/jama.1968.03150040051012
Abstract

Although the incidence of typhoid fever in this country has been decreasing,1 sporadic outbreaks continue to occur.2,3 Increasing numbers of military personnel and private citizens are being exposed to typhoid during foreign travel to areas where the disease is endemic; consequently, the diagnosis of typhoid fever remains an important problem. The definitive diagnostic procedure is isolation of Salmonella typhosa from blood, stool, or occasionally, urine, but serologic tests are still widely used. This communication will briefly discuss the following aspects of serologic tests for typhoid fever: the antigens used, cross-reactivity with other salmonellae, traditional interpretive criteria of test results, serologic response in the vaccinated patient, the effect of antibiotic treatment on antibody response, and the Vi test for identifying typhoid carriers.

Diagnostic tests for typhoid bacillus, such as Widal's reaction, are tube dilution tests which measure agglutinating antibodies against O and H antigens. The Vi antigen is used

×