[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
July 12, 1976

What to Expect From Expectorants

Author Affiliations

From the Los Angeles County-Olive View Medical Center, Van Nuys, Calif, and the UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles.

JAMA. 1976;236(2):193-194. doi:10.1001/jama.1976.03270020061034

DO MEDICATIONS really help mobilize mucus from the respiratory tract? Are the traditional physicians correct when they try to get the asthmatic child to "vomit" sputum out of the lungs? Do all the numerous cough and cold mixtures have any more effect on expectoration than the glass of water used to wash the medication down? Are inhaled agents superior to those administered by mouth? These are difficult questions to answer, and reliable information is scanty—mainly because of the well-recognized difficulty in quantifying and qualifying a patient's sputum. Nevertheless, many physicians and more patients are convinced that certain favored prescriptions do have a beneficial effect on respiratory secretions.

Traditional and Modern Expectorants  The various American formularies and pharmacopeias are relatively reluctant to praise the traditional expectorants, but an English drug encyclopedia, Martindale's Extra Pharmacopoeia, lists a surprisingly large range of such medications that are undoubtedly foisted by British physicians on their