This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
To the Editor.—
Dr. John Prutting referred to a statistical study previously presented, "An Autopsy Study of Cancer Patients" (221:1471, 1971), as a basis for interjecting his own thoughts on the performance of autopsies (222:1556, 1972). He cites the benefits, well recognized, and then in an aside takes issue with the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Hospitals for their change in attitude in not insisting on a certain number being performed as a requirement for accreditation. It is my understanding that most states have a minimum autopsy requirement, around 20% or more, before they, in turn, issue an annual approval of hospitals within their confines.To perform an autopsy is no "chore." To do it blindly with no more indication than a permit and a corresponding dead body, with no diagnosis and naught of value in the record is a somewhat useless task, valuable only to the prosector. To carry it
Wheelock MC. Autopsies. JAMA. 1973;223(10):1157. doi:10.1001/jama.1973.03220100051018