[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.161.168.87. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
April 9, 1973

More About Laparoscopy

Author Affiliations

Phoenix, Ariz

JAMA. 1973;224(2):249. doi:10.1001/jama.1973.03220150057027

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

To the Editor.—  Drs. Wadhwa and McKenzie, in their letter to the Editor of The Journal of Dec 18 (222:1558, 1972), have correctly pointed out that laparoscopy must be considered an operative procedure that is not without potential risks. It would seem unfair, however, to portray laparoscopy as being more dangerous than laparotomy or vaginal tubal ligation; both of these procedures have very significant and inherent surgical risks. In addition, they do not have those advantages of laparoscopy, of being both a sterilization and diagnostic out-patient procedure of low cost and minimal discomfort and scarring.Of the two series quoted in their letter, one is rather small and the other is concerned primarily with the gastroenterological use of laparoscopy associated with liver biopsy. Of the 19 deaths reported in the latter article, 15 were related either with the liver biopsy or the associated liver disease. Deaths associated to laparoscopy were

×