[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.166.48.3. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
September 20, 1976

Randomized Prospective Trial of Continuous vs Intermittent Heparin Therapy

Author Affiliations

From the Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin Center For Health Sciences, Madison. Dr Glazier was a fellow in Hematology at the University of Wisconsin, Madison. He is now with the Department of Medicine, Medical College of Virginia, Richmond.

JAMA. 1976;236(12):1365-1367. doi:10.1001/jama.1976.03270130027021
Abstract

Forty-one patients with clinical indications for heparin therapy were randomized to receive continuous intravenous heparin sodium therapy or intermittent (four-hourly bolus) heparin therapy, with control by the activated partial thromboplastin time. Seven of 21 patients receiving intermittent therapy had major bleeding episodes, whereas none of the 20 patients receiving continuous heparin therapy had major bleeding (P=.005). One patient on continuous therapy had a pulmonary embolus, while none on intermittent therapy had recurrent thromboembolism. Two heavily bleeding patients on intermittent therapy were switched to continuous treatment after bleeding was controlled. The use of continuous heparin therapy appears significantly safer with regard to hemorrhagic complications than the use of intermittent therapy.

(JAMA 236:1365-1367, 1976)

×