[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.163.147.69. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
August 13, 1973

Prostatosis

Author Affiliations

Camden, NJ

JAMA. 1973;225(7):751. doi:10.1001/jama.1973.03220340055033

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

To the Editor.—  My comment to the article by Dr. Edwin M. Meares, Jr. entitled "Bacterial Prostatitis vs 'Prostatosis': A Clinical and Bacteriological Study" (224:1372, 1973) does not detract from the ideas presented by him but echoes a comment made several years ago by Dr. Jean Oliver. We physicians tend to use a lot of words, many of which we make up as we go along. Unfortunately, our urge to invent sometimes escapes the limits of proper etymology. Dr. Meares has proposed the term "prostatosis." The suffix "osis" means "full of" and is used properly in such words as hemochromatosis, polyposis, and sarcoidosis. Dr. Oliver pointed out the incongruity of the term "nephrosis," which is so widely used today. Since I do not believe Dr. Meares is suggesting that the patient is "full of prostate," and so that we may prevent the adoption of another awkward and useless word, it

×