[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.161.216.242. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
January 14, 1974

Propranolol Controversy

Author Affiliations

American Medical Association Chicago

JAMA. 1974;227(2):201-202. doi:10.1001/jama.1974.03230150049020
Abstract

To the Editor.—  The letter of Doctor Fisch (226:1009, 1973) requires some comment, although his remarks concerning the labeling of propranolol for use in angina pectoris are now somewhat anachronistic. Almost simultaneously with the Commentary on propranolol by the Department of Drugs, the manufacturer obtained approval from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to include the treatment of angina pectoris among the labeled indications for the drug. There actually have been a substantial number of well-controlled studies to support this use, and these surely were taken into consideration by the FDA in its action. We believe, however, that the Department's monograph succeeded better than the government-approved labeling in placing the proper role of the drug in perspective. For example, the physician relying solely on the manufacturer's package insert could be left confused and uncertain about the continuing importance of sublingual nitrates in the management of the disease.All that, however,

×