This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
To the Editor.—
We wish to respond to Dr. Palmer's editorial critique (229:73, 1974) of our article "Nasogastric Suction in the Treatment of Alcoholic Pancreatitis" (229:51, 1974). The results of our study indicated that nasogastric suction provided no clear-cut therapeutic advantage over no suction in the treatment of attacks of mild to moderately severe, uncomplicated, acute alcoholic pancreatitis.Dr. Palmer dismisses these results: Misappropriation of the scientific method results when a clinical trial utilizes case material that is not classified precisely. Consequently the mix of patients proves too heterogenous to permit a fair effort at comparison.... Apparently, he believes that we erred by grouping mild and moderately severe cases of pancreatitis together. This raises two questions: (1) Were our treatment groups satisfactorily matched in regard to severity? and (2) Is there a category of pancreatitis patient that we failed to identify that is benefited by suction?As described in the
Guth PH, Sturdevant RAL. Nasogastric Suction in Pancreatitis. JAMA. 1974;230(3):375. doi:10.1001/jama.1974.03240030017014