[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 50.16.107.222. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
January 5, 1994

The Diagnostic Value of the Forced Expiratory Time-Reply

Author Affiliations

Medical College of Wisconsin Milwaukee, Wis

JAMA. 1994;271(1):26. doi:10.1001/jama.1994.03510250041024
Abstract

In Reply.  —We thank Drs Kern and Patel for their thoughts as to why the FET as a diagnostic test of OAD proved better in our study than theirs.1 Kern and Patel state that a limitation of our study was that the population was limited to preoperative subjects. We performed a cross-sectional, blinded study to evaluate the PET using a group of 400 consecutive subjects who presented to the pulmonary-function testing laboratory of a large hospital. Our subject population was representative of a clinic population using the services of a tertiary care hospital. In contrast, the study by Kern and Patel was limited to 229 plumbers who volunteered to participate in a screening examination for asbestos-related disease. The markedly different results probably reflect differences in study populations. In our population, we found a 55% prevalence of OAD. For diagnostic purposes, a FET threshold of 6 seconds or greater provides

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×