[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
January 12, 1994

Prioritization and Organ Distribution for Liver Transplantation

Author Affiliations

From the Pittsburgh Transplant Institute, University of Pittsburgh (Pa) Medical Center. Dr Van Thiel is now with the Oklahoma Transplantation Institute, Baptist Medical Center, Oklahoma City.

JAMA. 1994;271(2):140-143. doi:10.1001/jama.1994.03510260072031
Abstract

THE CURRENT policies for cadaver kidney distribution were recently discussed in The Journal.1 Questions about liver allocation are even more important, because there is not the option of artificial organ support.2 Two principles of liver deployment have been advocated: efficiency of organ use and urgency of need.

THE EFFICIENCY PRINCIPLE 

Single Disease Studies 

Primary Biliary Cirrhosis.  —Patients with this disease have been stratified retrospectively into low-, medium-, and high-risk categories, and their actual survival after liver transplantation has been compared with the outcome expected without such intervention.3 This comparison depended on a Mayo hazard prediction model of the natural history of primary biliary cirrhosis (Table 1).4 Before the National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference of 1983,5 we reserved liver transplantation candidacy for patients with chronic disease whose life expectancy was a few months.6 The effect of this restrictive policy could be seen in

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×