[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.161.216.242. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
January 12, 1994

Doctors and the Law: Defendants and Expert Witnesses

Author Affiliations

University of Pittsburgh (Pa) School of Medicine

 

by Hiller B. Zobel and Stephen N. Rous, 208 pp, $22.95, ISBN 0-393-03450-X, New York, NY, WW Norton & Co, 1993.

JAMA. 1994;271(2):156-157. doi:10.1001/jama.1994.03510260088038

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

Doctors and the Law: Medical Jurisprudence in Nineteenth-Century America, by James C. Mohr, 319 pp, $30, ISBN 0-19-505384-2, New York, NY, Oxford University Press, 1993.

The physician who is a defendant in a medical malpractice action is in an obviously involuntary position, while the doctor who agrees to serve as a consultant and potential expert witness for an attorney does so on a purely voluntary basis. Nevertheless, there are numerous similarities between the two visà-vis lawyers, courts, and the legal process, and both roles are fraught with much danger if the physician is unprepared, legally inexperienced, and naive.

What should a physician do when confronted with the possibility of being sued for alleged professional negligence? How do you react then and later, if the threat of a lawsuit becomes a painful reality?

If your patient sues a third party for personal injuries (eg, automobile accident, product liability, job-related injury), what are your rights and responsibilities as a

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×