[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.197.65.227. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
October 24, 1986

Death and Injury by Firearms: Who Cares?-Reply

Author Affiliations

University of Virginia Charlottesville
Institute of Law, Psychiatry, and Public Policy University of Virginia Charlottesville

JAMA. 1986;256(16):2195. doi:10.1001/jama.1986.03380160053010

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

In Reply.—  Dr Miller's letter strikes a familiar note. The frustration he conveys is shared by many others who attribute the firearm wound epidemic to the repeated failures of legislators to restrict gun availability. We ask Dr Miller and those who share this prevalent outlook to consider the following points:

  1. The significance of a health problem cannot be fully assessed without adequate documentation. Currently, our knowledge of firearm injuries as a national public health problem is based solely on fatalities representing fewer than 20% of all cases. Without data on nonfatal cases, we will remain in the dark about the distributions of disabling and disfiguring sequelae, costs of acute care and long-term rehabilitation, and psychological and societal consequences of firearm trauma. Only information about nonfatal shootings can tell us how they differ from fatal

×