[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
February 2, 1994

A Clone by Any Other Name Is Still an Ethical Concern

JAMA. 1994;271(5):331-332. doi:10.1001/jama.1994.03510290013004

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.


THE DEBATE over one of medicine's most contentious issues—human embryo research—is beginning in earnest.

Public and private groups are convening this month to lay the groundwork for future policy recommendations on how research should proceed and the types of clinical applications that may be considered appropriate.

Much of the debate has been carried on for years in medical, scientific, and lay media quarters. But the newest round has been fueled by intense media speculation and ethical concerns surrounding laboratory research in duplicating polyploid embryos. It also is distinguished by a novel federal presence.

"This is the first time the subject is being approached at the federal government level," says Duane Alexander, MD, director of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, Md. "We're years behind."

Making Up for Lost Time  Federally sponsored research on in vitro fertilization (IVF) has been held in abeyance since 1980. Regulations in

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview