[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.205.0.26. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
March 2, 1979

Should the Patient Know?

Author Affiliations

M. D. Anderson Hospital and Tumor Institute The University of Texas System Cancer Center Houston

JAMA. 1979;241(9):928. doi:10.1001/jama.1979.03290350048024
Abstract

The article by Novack et al (p 897) reports a change in physicians' attitudes toward this question. Physicians are aware of several important social changes in our culture that have contributed to this change. Many could be mentioned, including the dramatic change in the malpractice situation that encourages physicians to minimize liability by transferring knowledge to the patient; the laws mandating freedom of information, which have brought the confidentiality of the physician-patient relationship to the public; the effects of federal legislation affecting payment of physicians' fees through insurance carriers; the Professional Standards Review Organization; and other types of professional review activities, including the Food and Drug Administration review of informed consent documents.

However, in addition to these social changes, there is an important positive aspect in sharing prognostic information with the patient—the growing importance of clinical research in health care. Clinical science and therapeutic research during the last 30 years

×