[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
February 9, 1994

Prehospital-Initiated vs Hospital-Initiated Thrombolytic Therapy for Myocardial Infarction

Author Affiliations

Heart Center of Salt Lake Salt Lake City, Utah

JAMA. 1994;271(6):426. doi:10.1001/jama.1994.03510300026018

To the Editor.  —Only occasionally do articles demonstrating no significant differences publish β statistics. In the trial by Weaver et al1 in which there was a 30% lower mortality rate in the patients treated in a prehospital fashion compared with the control population, there was no significant difference. According to my crude estimates, a trial of this size has about a 38% chance, almost four of 10, of not detecting even a 40% reduction in mortality given the numbers of patients studied. In other words, there is more than one chance in three that the conclusion published here is inaccurate.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview