[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.167.149.128. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
April 6, 1979

`A Modern View of the Surgical Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Disease'A Critical Response

Author Affiliations

US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare; US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare Albert Einstein College of Medicine Bronx, NY
From the Health Standards and Quality Bureau (Dr Mankowitz), and Office of Policy, Planning, and Research (Dr Taylor), Health Care Financing Administration, US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare; and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY.

JAMA. 1979;241(14):1467-1468. doi:10.1001/jama.1979.03290400027015
Abstract

MILLER and Griepp1 presented a lucid description of the current state of the art in the surgery of peripheral vascular disease. Because of the authoritative nature of such an article, we believe that it is important to present a different point of view.

The authors have fallen prey to two fallacies—one fairly subtle, the other a more usual type. In the first instance, they convey the impression that the peripheral arteries are all equivalent. Methods of diagnosis and treatment that work for one should work for all. This ignores the exceedingly important differences between the structures and organs those arteries supply. The brain, which is supplied by the carotid and vertebrobasilar arteries, is totally different in its function and importance from either the foot or any of the viscera.

In our opinion, transposing surgical methods that may be effective in preventing gangrene of the foot to the extracerebral vasculature

×