[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 50.16.107.222. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
March 13, 1987

Patients and Practitioners: Lay Perceptions of Medicine in Pre-Industrial Society

Author Affiliations

Temple University Philadelphia

Temple University Philadelphia

 

edited by Roy Porter (Cambridge History of Medicine, C. Webster and C. Rosenberg, eds), 356 pp, $49.50, New York, Cambridge University Press, 1985.

JAMA. 1987;257(10):1397-1398. doi:10.1001/jama.1987.03390100135041

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

This is a series of 11 studies, all but two of which focus on England in the 17th and 18th centuries. (One contribution is concerned with classical antiquity and another with traditional Arabic medicine.) The studies are based on diverse sources, examine different individuals and communities, and analyze separate fragments of a larger question—the interplay of health, culture, and society. Although diverse, the studies share a common goal: the understanding of health, sickness, and therapy from the perspective of the patient and the layman.

This is not a book in which physicians command center stage. Even Galen is reduced to the status of a minor sycophant. Indeed, it is a central theme of this volume that physicians in preindustrial societies—and healers in general—appeared and served only at the beck and call of patients and their families. In these studies, the laity take an active and, at times, dominant role in

×