[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.146.176.35. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
December 4, 1981

Hospitalization for Tubal Sterilization

Author Affiliations

San Antonio, Tex

JAMA. 1981;246(22):2576. doi:10.1001/jama.1981.03320220028013
Abstract

To the Editor.—  The article by Peter M. Layde, MD, et al (1981;245:714) warrants further comment and an update of the subject.Substantial reductions in the length of stay (LOS) after sexual tubal sterilization (STS) have been achieved in the past five years since those described by Layde et al; many contemporary facilities have now settled on a stay of four to six hours postoperatively as the standard of therapy. In achieving this, the laparoscope was but one of the technical innovations contributing to the reduction rather than its cause; other important changes were in progress in the last ten years that brought about the short LOS.First, favorable experience with STS by family planners in India and Southeast Asia during the early 1970s performed in free-standing clinics and "tubectomy" camps used little or no analgesia or anesthesia, and minimal postoperative supervision was needed for safe recovery.1 Later, Lubell

×