[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
May 8, 1987

Volume and Outcome of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery

Author Affiliations

The Deaconess Hospital Cincinnati

The Deaconess Hospital Cincinnati

JAMA. 1987;257(18):2434. doi:10.1001/jama.1987.03390180052010

To the Editor.—  The recent article entitled "Association of Volume With Outcome of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery" by Showstack et al1 was an interesting analysis of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgical results. Several conclusions were drawn from this analysis that require further comment.The major conclusion of this article, based on statistical analysis of the discharge abstracts for 18 986 CABG operations at 77 hospitals, was that the greatest improvement in mortality rates for CABG surgery would result from the closure of low-volume surgery units. To support this premise, the authors reported that CABG surgical programs performing 20 to 100 operations per year had a mortality rate of 5.2%, those programs performing 101 to 200 operations had a mortality rate of 3.9%, and those performing greater than 350 operations per year had a mortality rate of 3.1%. The numbers are certainly suggestive. However, as the authors acknowledge,