[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.211.168.204. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
July 3, 1987

Unrecognized High Prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis Cervical Infection in an Isolated Alaskan Eskimo Population

Author Affiliations

From the Institute for Health Policy Studies (Dr Toomey) and the Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program, Veterans Administration Medical Center (Dr Rafferty), University of California School of Medicine, San Francisco; and the Department of Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle (Dr Stamm).

From the Institute for Health Policy Studies (Dr Toomey) and the Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program, Veterans Administration Medical Center (Dr Rafferty), University of California School of Medicine, San Francisco; and the Department of Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle (Dr Stamm).

JAMA. 1987;258(1):53-56. doi:10.1001/jama.1987.03400010057027
Abstract

Chlamydia trachomatis genital infections often go unrecognized where specific culture diagnosis is not easily accessible. We studied the prevalence and clinical correlates of C trachomatis in a geographically isolated Alaskan Eskimo population with a high rate of gonorrhea but for whom specific chlamydial diagnosis had never been available. Using a direct immunofluorescent stain of endocervical secretions, we screened 493 women (52% of all women of reproductive age) when they presented to regional health facilities during the year-long study period. Chlamydia trachomatis was identified in 23% (114/493), including 39% (31/80) of teenagers, 30% (34/115) of prenatal patients, 47% (7/15) of pregnant teens, and 40% (8/19) of women with pelvic inflammatory disease. Genital symptoms, clinical signs, and the presence of concomitant gonorrhea were ineffective means of identifying chlamydial infection. This study demonstrates the successful use, and public health importance, of nonculture direct testing to document the unrecognized high prevalence of C trachomatis infection where culture diagnosis is not available.

(JAMA 1987;258:53-56)

×