[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.146.179.146. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
July 17, 1987

Physicians, Vital Statistics, and Disease Reporting

Author Affiliations

Centers for Disease Control Atlanta

Centers for Disease Control Atlanta

JAMA. 1987;258(3):379-381. doi:10.1001/jama.1987.03400030095040
Abstract

Why should physicians know how to complete death certificates? What diseases must be reported to health departments? While these questions may not titillate all readers of The Journal, the fact is that mortality and morbidity data provided by clinical practitioners serve as the foundation of essential databases used for planning, implementing, and evaluating health programs at all levels in the United States. As such, the role played by the practitioner in reporting health data has far-reaching effects on our nation's health programs.

The medical literature has increasingly focused attention on the implications for accuracy in completing death certificates and other forms that are essential to meet the health information needs of the United States. For example, articles in The Journal and other publications have recently addressed topics such as uses of multiple-cause-of-death data, reporting of congenital malformations, the imperative of documenting tobacco use—related mortality, surveillance for infectious diseases, and the

×