[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.166.89.187. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
August 7, 1987

Medicine, Radiation, and Probability of Causation-Reply

Author Affiliations

American Medical Association Chicago

American Medical Association Chicago

JAMA. 1987;258(5):610. doi:10.1001/jama.1987.03400050051014

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

In Reply.—  Drs Rail and Yalow state correctly that Public Law 97-414 requires the development of the Radioepidemiological Tables without identification of how the tables should be used in lawsuits. That observation is exactly the concern addressed in the recommendations of the Council on Scientific Affairs. These recommendations do not propose revisions in the existing law. Instead, they counsel against possible misapplications of the tables. This counsel does not imply that groups to be exempted from application of the tables may be guilty of practices leading to a high probability of causation. Instead, it suggests that diagnostic and therapeutic applications of radiation, and the small exposures that accompany these applications, constitute conditions different from those providing most of the data for construction of the Radioepidemiological Tables.In medical procedures using radiation, the exposure usually is confined to a specific anatomic region and delivered under carefully controlled conditions. Furthermore, radiation is

×