[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.205.87.3. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
March 11, 1988

Occupation and Coronary Disease: Schooling as a Confounder-Reply

Author Affiliations

Harvard Medical School Brigham and Women's Hospital Boston

Harvard Medical School Brigham and Women's Hospital Boston

JAMA. 1988;259(10):1497. doi:10.1001/jama.1988.03720100018019

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

In Reply.  —Mr Leigh suggests that the association between occupational status and fatal coronary heart disease (CHD) observed in our study might be overstated because of a failure to control for confounding by level of schooling. For this to have accounted for the findings, schooling must have been related to occupation and, in addition, must be associated with risk of fatal CHD. Regarding the former, nobody would disagree with the statement that level of schooling is related to occupational status. With respect to the latter, however, to be a confounder, the association of schooling with CHD must be independent of the relationship with occupational status. While we agree that level of schooling, as a marker for socioeconomic status, is related to risk of CHD, we know of no evidence that schooling per se is an independent causal risk factor. Further, our study did control for a strong correlate of socioeconomic

×