[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
May 18, 1994

Hospital Peer Review: A New Proposal

Author Affiliations

Prince George's Hospital Center Cheverly, Md
Birch and Davis Associates, Inc Silver Spring, Md

JAMA. 1994;271(19):1485. doi:10.1001/jama.1994.03510430037029

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.


To the Editor.  —For many years the basis of hospital peer review has been internally driven by physicians and nurses reviewing one another. This has been accomplished by volunteer physicians through hospital committees at no cost to the institution. To our knowledge, the real cost in terms of person-hours has never been calculated, but it has never been a concern because of willing volunteerism.As public confidence in our ability to review ourselves has eroded, the concept of "external" peer review has developed. This has the obvious advantage of reviewers' not being personally involved with the "reviewees," but also has the major disadvantage of cost. We must consider that as physicians' incomes decrease with health system reform and as demands on our time increase, the willingness of physicians to volunteer this service may diminish. At some point, reviewers both internally and externally may demand payment for services rendered.Nevertheless, up

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview