[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.205.87.3. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
May 18, 1994

Policy Options for Public Long-term Care Insurance

Author Affiliations

From the Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC (Dr Norton), and the Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, the Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Mass, and the Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass (Dr Newhouse).

JAMA. 1994;271(19):1520-1524. doi:10.1001/jama.1994.03510430074038
Abstract

CONTROVERSY surrounds the place of long-term care insurance as part of national health system reform and the nature of such insurance if it is to be part of the reform. Some groups, most notably those representing older adults, believe that the current financing system, which relies heavily on the Medicaid program, must be altered. Others would not modify present arrangements, at least in the short run.

Under current law, individuals are eligible for nursing home benefits through Medicaid if they have few assets other than housing equity. The following proposals would markedly change these arrangements:

  • The Pepper Commission1 recommends a universal insurance system for those sufficiently disabled, but limits benefits to an initial period of 3 months. After 3 months, nursing home residents would pay for everything, unless they are poor enough to qualify for coverage similar to the current Medicaid program.

  • Analysts at the Brookings Institution2 advocate expanding the

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×