[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.211.82.105. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
January 2, 1981

Treatment of Acne-Reply

Author Affiliations

Salt Lake City

JAMA. 1981;245(1):30. doi:10.1001/jama.1981.03310260014010

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

In Reply.—  First, a comment on Dr Voron's initial statement concerning Table 2. The average for each degree of dryness is weighted in the statistical analysis according to the number of patients in that category. The dryness score of 3 contained only four subjects, which meant that the percent improvement of 49% weighted much less in the final statistical analysis than did the dryness score of 2 that contained 12 subjects with an average percent improvement of 41%. A superficial scan of this table clearly shows that dryness scores of 0 to 1 indicated that those subjects who had minimally dry skin showed improvement of 60+%, and those who had drier skin (with scores of 2 or 3) had only a 40+% improvement at 16 weeks.The most important argument against Dr Voron's first point, however, is that the statistical analysis showed an inverse correlation between dryness and clearing of

×