[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.211.120.181. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
May 25, 1994

Evaluating Quality Performance in Alternate Health Care Delivery SystemsA Critical Challenge

JAMA. 1994;271(20):1620-1621. doi:10.1001/jama.1994.03510440080038
Abstract

As the American health care system continues to undergo major structural changes, concerns about the impact of changes in delivery and financing mechanisms on quality of care are rapidly increasing.1 Most federal and state legislative proposals for health care system reform include provisions for evaluating quality.2 "Report cards" on clinical and organizational performance have generated considerable interest as a way to compare quality in alternate delivery systems.3,4 Public- and privatesector efforts to develop effective strategies to evaluate quality and facilitate quality improvement are expanding.

With this attention, quality has become a more visible, but also a more complicated and confusing, issue. Concerns about the adequacy of available approaches to assess performance and measure quality are frequent.5 Debates among policymakers, legislators, researchers, and others about matters such as what are the most important issues related to quality, how to evaluate major dimensions of quality, and how to

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×