[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.161.168.21. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
May 28, 1982

Differential Diagnosis of Hypercalcemia

Author Affiliations

University of Texas Medical School Houston

JAMA. 1982;247(20):2780. doi:10.1001/jama.1982.03320450018015

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

To the Editor.—  Wong and Freier (1982;247:75) have presented an algorithm for use of laboratory tests in the differential diagnosis of hypercalcemia that fails to use valuable historical information until step 4 of their scheme. Decision 4 requires the answer to the question concerning the patient's use of drugs that could cause hypercalcemia. I suggest that this basic piece of historical data be used in the algorithm at a much earlier decision point. Evaluation of the patient's drug history at an earlier point could save the patient, whose condition is being evaluated by this decision pathway, the pain and risks of multiple venipunctures and the costs of the concomitant laboratory tests. Rufus of Ephesus (c 100 AD) pointed out that the history is an invaluable part of the diagnostic evaluation. I see no reason to ignore historical data until well into the workup of hypercalcemia.

×