[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.161.168.87. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
February 20, 1981

Implantation of an Artificial PancreasCurrent Perspectives

Author Affiliations

William Spencer
From the Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque (Drs Schade and Eaton), and Sandia Laboratories, Livermore, Calif (Mr Spencer).

JAMA. 1981;245(7):709-710. doi:10.1001/jama.1981.03310320031019
Abstract

DURING the 1970s, implantation of an artificial pancreas as a potential cure for diabetes received much publicity. Recently, successful diabetic treatment with explanted insulin delivery devices1 has accelerated efforts toward total implantation.

Despite this enthusiasm, the clinical timetable for implantation in diabetic humans is unresolved. Both our group and others have successfully implanted dogs with insulin delivery systems for periods ranging from weeks to months.2,3 Advances in technology of insulin delivery systems have been so rapid that within months, remotely controlled implantable insulin delivery devices will be available to many investigators, including ourselves. With more than 5 million diabetic patients in this country, should widespread, clinical implantation of these devices begin immediately?

The answer to this question relates to the benefits vs the risks of implantation. Loss of endocrine pancreatic function (ie, insulin secretion) does not result in death, as occurs with the loss of kidney or cardiac function.

×