[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 184.73.122.162. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
March 13, 1981

Postoperative Vaginal Discharge-Reply

Author Affiliations

Mount Sinai Hospital New York

JAMA. 1981;245(10):1026. doi:10.1001/jama.1981.03310350016010
Abstract

In Reply.—  I wish to thank Dr Handsfield for his important comments.The description was "examination of the cervix" was "within normal limits." Nevertheless, if the white mucus vaginal discharge requiring the daily use of a tampon for 18 months in fact came from the endocervical canal, if it was mucopurulent without trichomonads and with a negative gonorrhea culture, then it might be caused by Chlamydia, especially if the patient's asymptomatic husband had nongonococcal urethritis.The diagnostic problem is complex because (1) it may be that most infected women with endocervical Chlamydia are asymptomatic1; (2) when Chlamydia causes clinical infection of the cervix it is variable and not distinctive; (3) there may be a purulent endocervical discharge not caused by Chlamydia; and (4) Chlamydia often coexists with other sexually transmitted diseases. Furthermore, the actual diagnosis requires tissue culture facilities not generally available.Though I agree with the recommendations, if

×