[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
June 5, 1981


Author Affiliations

San Diego
From the Departments of Anesthesia, Pomerado Hospital, Poway, Calif, and the University of California, San Diego.

JAMA. 1981;245(21):2182-2183. doi:10.1001/jama.1981.03310460034011

Steady scientific progress continues to be made on broad fronts in the specialty of anesthesiology. There are several that deserve highlighting and are presented here, not necessarily in order of their importance.

Invasive Monitoring  Invasive monitoring continues to receive substantial attention in the literature and at postgraduate symposia. The difficult question is when to monitor and, more specifically, when to monitor pulmonary capillary wedge pressures. Guidelines for use of balloon-tipped catheters were first suggested by Swan and Ganz1 in 1974. However, the topic continues to be debated heavily. One is struck with the wide spectrum of positions taken on this subject. Swan2 revealed his own bias by declaring central venous pressure (CVP) monitoring to be outmoded.Mangano,3 in admirable fashion, has recently made an effort to compare the CVP with the pulmonary capillary wedge pressure under varying conditions in a group of patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. Simultaneous