[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.146.176.35. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
December 9, 1988

Wound Ballistics

Author Affiliations

East Tennessee State University Quillen-Dishner College of Medicine Bristol Family Practice Center Bristol, Tenn

East Tennessee State University Quillen-Dishner College of Medicine Bristol Family Practice Center Bristol, Tenn

JAMA. 1988;260(22):3279. doi:10.1001/jama.1988.03410220061026
Abstract

To the Editor. —  I would like to commend Dr Fackler1 for his excellent article in the May 13 issue of JAMA explaining the mechanisms of gunshot injury. Much misinformation continues to be propagated in both scientific and lay literature on this subject, and this article should help to reduce the confusion. It cannot be overemphasized that dogmatically basing treatment recommendations on velocity or energy level of the bullet is inappropriate. Too many factors influence the bullet-tissue interaction for any formula to be able to predict the severity of injury. Not having access to facilities for producing standardized ballistic gelatin targets or high-speed photographs, I have tested many types of bullets in some of the less realistic media Dr Fackler mentions and have found the shot-to-shot variability of results to be impressive. Were the figures illustrating wound channels typical specimens from large series or composites?I was interested in

×