[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.159.129.152. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
July 6, 1994

CORRECTIONS

JAMA. 1994;272(1):11. doi:10.1001/jama.1994.03520010019008

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

In the article "Flaws Documented, Reforms Debated at Congress on Journal Peer Review" (JAMA. 1993;270:2775-2778), a statement in the third full paragraph on page 2776 requires clarification. The first sentence should read as follows: "A survey by 71 of the 73 US-based journals with the highest citation frequency scores on the 1989 Institute for Scientific Information Journal Citation Reports reveals that 28% do not ask reviewers to assess a paper's novelty, 31% do not specifically ask about clarity, and 49% do not ask if conclusions are reasonable."

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×