[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 184.73.122.162. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
March 17, 1989

The Sensitivity and Specificity of Clinical Diagnostics During Five DecadesToward an Understanding of Necessary Fallibility

Author Affiliations

From the Department of Pathology (Drs Anderson and Key) and the New Mexico Tumor Registry (Dr Key), University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque; and the Department of Pathology, State University of New York Health Science Center, Syracuse (Dr Hill).

From the Department of Pathology (Drs Anderson and Key) and the New Mexico Tumor Registry (Dr Key), University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque; and the Department of Pathology, State University of New York Health Science Center, Syracuse (Dr Hill).

JAMA. 1989;261(11):1610-1617. doi:10.1001/jama.1989.03420110086029
Abstract

Published studies encompassing more than 50 000 autopsies were assessed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of clinical diagnostics (the diagnostic process) in persons dying of 1 of 11 specific diseases during the period 1930 through 1977. The accuracy of clinical diagnostics, as reflected in these two determinations, appeared to improve over this period with respect to some of the diseases studied (rheumatic heart disease and leukemia), while for others it worsened (pulmonary tuberculosis, peritonitis, carcinoma of the lung, gastric carcinoma, and carcinoma of the liver and extrahepatic biliary tract) and for a significant number diagnostic accuracy seemed refractory to sustained change (pulmonary embolism, primary cirrhosis of the liver, gastric/peptic ulcer, and acute coronary thrombosis/myocardial infarction). The findings suggest a new way in which the autopsy can be used to monitor clinical diagnostics to identify possible sources of systematic weaknesses and provide data that can be used to approach the difficult subject of necessary fallibility.

(JAMA. 1989;261:1610-1617)

×