[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.197.66.254. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
October 1, 1982

Statistics in Practice

Author Affiliations

Environmental Epidemiology Branch National Cancer Institute Bethesda, Md

 

articles published in the British Medical Journal, by Sheila M. Gore and Douglas G. Altman, 100 pp, with illus, $27.50, London, British Medical Association, 1982.

JAMA. 1982;248(13):1647. doi:10.1001/jama.1982.03330130095047

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

Surveys by several authors suggest that the number of poorly designed and poorly analyzed studies that are published in reputable medical journals is distressingly high. As a group, researchers must thus be more fully aware of the importance of the statistical aspects of a study (which may include consultation with statisticians) in order that conclusions are justifiably drawn. Readers also must possess the tools to assess critically whether a study is based on correct and relevant statistical principles, since the appearance of a study in a journal does not necessarily imply statistical accuracy. Statistics in Practice seeks to provide a framework for nonstatisticians to upgrade their statistical understanding. The book succeeds admirably.

The first section of the book, by Mr Altman, is subtitled "Statistics and Ethics in Medical Research" and is organized into eight chapters. He begins with the well-argued proposition that bad statistics is unethical. The more usual concern

×