[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
September 21, 1994

The Distribution of Organs for Liver Transplantation-Reply

Author Affiliations

University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh, Pa
Oklahoma Transplantation Institute Oklahoma City

JAMA. 1994;272(11):849. doi:10.1001/jama.1994.03520110026014

In Reply.  —It is true that one of the authors (T.E.S.) endorsed the original organ distribution plans and in fact wrote them in May 1987 in order to prevent a UNOS default of contract obligation. One plan was for kidneys and the other for extrarenal organs. Disputes within the appointed organ distribution committee had prevented development of the required document. What was used was taken verbatim from two impending publications describing the distribution systems already in place in Pittsburgh.1,2 The existence of these manuscripts had been made known to UNOS by two colleagues, resulting in the last-minute recruitment of Dr Starzl.The principles of both plans are still embraced by UNOS, but with a changed meaning. Originally, overwhelming weight for liver distribution was given to urgency of need because there is no treatment option comparable with the artificial kidney. "Boutique" liver recipients called in for operation from the 19th

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview