[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.158.173.184. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
January 5, 1990

Surgical Therapy for Coronary Disease: Randomized and Observational Studies

Author Affiliations

The Veterans Administration Medical Center West Haven, Conn

The Veterans Administration Medical Center West Haven, Conn

JAMA. 1990;263(1):34. doi:10.1001/jama.1990.03440010031013
Abstract

To the Editor.—  A recent article from the important Duke observational study1 of coronary bypass surgery and medical therapy claimed "a significant improvement in patient survival with contemporary surgical therapy for the majority of patients with ischemic heart disease." What is worrisome in this report based on follow-up of 5809 patients is the reliance on the Cox2 model as the sole method of analysis. As in the Veterans Adminstration trial,3 the data in Fig 1 of the article seem to indicate that the proportional hazards assumption may be violated with extended follow-up. If so, the treatment effect cannot be summarized by a single hazard ratio, as in Figs 4 and 7, because the effect is not constant over time. Logically, the hazard ratio cannot be expected to remain constant. Since surgery prolongs life, particularly in high-risk patients, the overall surgical hazard would be expected to increase when

×