[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 184.73.122.162. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
January 12, 1990

Intrauterine Devices

Author Affiliations

Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic

Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic

JAMA. 1990;263(2):236. doi:10.1001/jama.1990.03440020069026
Abstract

To the Editor.—  In the Questions and Answers section of JAMA1 there is a report on the views of the Diagnostic and Therapeutic Technology Assessment Panelists on intrauterine devices (IUDs).When describing the mechanism of action of the copper-containing IUD, the following statement is made: "The contraceptive action of copper appears to be entirely within the uterus; ovulation is normal but implantation is inhibited."We recently published a study2 that contradicts this theory.Our study consisted of searching for eggs from the tubal and uterine flushings of 115 control subjects who were not using contraceptives and 56 IUD users (of which 27 were Copper T 200 users). All were undergoing surgical sterilization within 132 hours following the luteinizing hormone peak.The percent of ova recovered from the tubal flushings of the IUD group was lower (39%) compared with the percent recovered in the control group (56%) (.05<

×